REQUESTED CALIFORNIA ELECTION CODE CHANGES

California Election Code 15360

Semifinal Official Canvas

Article 5:

One Percent Manual Tally

Requested additions:

  1. That the results of the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY be posted publicly and available to the public. (I have had to write a public records request to receive it here in LA County. I have asked for it in digital form but have only received it on paper.)

  2. (now in revised law) That the corrected results from the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY be included in the certified results; that is, the corrected totals for the selected precincts be changed, when necessary, to reflect the hand counted corrected results.)

  3. That candidates be notified when the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY shows, in any contest, that a different candidate won compared to the announced results.

  4. That when the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY shows that a different candidate won compared to the announced winner, (#3) then automatically at least 10% of the precincts in that contest also be recounted by hand in that contest.

  5. That the poll books with voters’ signatures should be recounted and compared to the total ballots cast, as part of the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY.

  6. (now in revised law) That the absentee and provisional ballots –counted and rejected—be included as part of the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY: hand counted and reported.

I would invite lawmakers to consider the serious inadequacy of the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY of precincts to show if the election results are accurate. In some cases 1% of precincts may not even be 1% of the total ballots cast. If this ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY of precincts is meant to serve as a legitimate audit of each election, then California lawmakers should consider replacing the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY with a real audit that should include at least 10% of ballots cast in all precincts. DEBRA BOWEN NOW CONSIDERING REVISING 15360. I am aware that not all the registrar’s of voters in California conduct the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY. Perhaps the Secretary of State can issue a directive stating that she/he will not accept the final certified vote totals at the end of the canvas period without the results of the ONE PERCENT MANUAL TALLY also being submitted. Perhaps that added pressure would force compliance with this legally required mini-audit. CA Election Code15625 Semifinal Official Canvas: Article 2: special recount boards; members; appointment; compensation; supervision.

Requested clarification:

1. That the cost of the recount should be only what is stated in this section, “Each member of a recount board shall receive the same compensation per day as is paid in the jurisdiction within which the recount is being conducted to members of precinct boards, other than inspectors, to be paid out of the appropriate public treasury.”

Although the Registrar of Voters in Orange County followed that law in a recount last December, both Conny McCormack, LA County, and Michael Haas, San Diego County charged (from our request for an itemized account of expenses) for security, overhead, and the salaries of the administrators for that day or days in addition to the payment to the members of the recount boards. Therefore the costs were $7,109.00 instead of $1,200.00 and $8,756.00 instead of $1,800.00. These election officials are paid their salaries to respond to citizen requests for recounts and should not be paid double. McCormack and Haas stated that they had the right to charge over and above what the Election Code stipulates. Please clarify if registrars are legally able to charge these additional charges. This overcharging of citizens for a recount has the effect of a SLAPP action and makes this double-check for an accurate vote count out of reach of everyday citizens. Is it possible for citizens to be repaid the extra expenses that these registrars charged in August 2005 and Dec. 2006?

 

Suggested additions to the Voters’ Bill of Rights:

One other action that perhaps does not require a law change is to have the following items listed on the voters' bill of rights posted at the precincts. Maybe Debra, as SoS, can approve these to be added:

  1. A voter has the right to request and receive a paper ballot as an alternative to using electronic voting options and has the right to have that paper ballot hand counted. (The paper ballot will not be provisional.)

  2. Citizens may observe any and all activities during the closing of the polls. (CA Election Code:15201)